Sunday, April 17, 2016

ABORTION: THE PARADOXES, THE COMPLEXITIES AND THE PERPLEXITIES



 ABORTION: THE PARADOXES, THE COMPLEXITIES AND THE PERPLEXITIES
ELUSIYAN TOLU’ FRANCIS
As I sit and begin to write, and nothing is in sight, but something came to mind, I can’t believe you took his life, you should know now and knew then that you have no right. It was a selfish choice that you made. You chose yourself when his life, you could have saved.
Though the baby’s conceived, without being planned. A night of passion, with an unknown or known man. Nine months are slowly getting close, you are surrounded by his blanket, slowly he is growing in your womb, please do not send him to the tomb. Have mercy on him, he can become great tomorrow, let him live, he also has the right to life “ejo, edakun, emabinu” let him also live “ko le di iru, kole dogban lola
Much we have seen much we have heard. Stories and sceneries about abortion cases. Stories about the survivors, stories about the so called doctors, stories about the mothers. Sometimes these stories support the children, and the pro life cause, but other times they support the pro choice movement.
If we think about it for a moment, their titles is all wrong. They are not pro choice at all. They are anti life campaigners. The ultimate child abuse, child molesting, physical and emotional abuse of children is all forms of child abuse, but abortion too.
Abortion is morally and ethically wrong, and damaging and should be jettisoned and be illegal. Abortion of a human life within the mother’s womb is physically damaging, emotionally traumatic and ethically wrong. The attempted murder of a human life still within the mother’s womb is physically damaging, to both mother and child. If the abortionist makes a “mistake” and the baby which was being aborted is born alive, the chances of them having a debilitating disorder is high such disorders has cerebral palsy. These are common among the survivors. In some cases, the process of abortion is also harmful to the mother, such as future pregnancy being impossible, even the mother bleeding to death. These procedures are dangerous, extremely risky and very damaging. These damages are almost always irreversible and affect both mother and child.
Doesn’t the law clearly state that murder is a horrendous criminal offence, and the murder should be jailed? Well then, why does the law permit the killing of a human life within the womb? May be it is because they cannot speak out. That is, unless the abortionist who is trying to kill them didn’t finish the job properly. Then they can survive if the abortionist does not get to them first. Abortionist can try to kill a mistakenly born child by other horrific means such as strangulation. You can’t convince pro lifers that this is by any measure fair. The law is very slack and doesn’t enforce its own rules for murder.
Abortion is very literally, murder but the law is slack, and in many cases, the knowledge of an abortion is hush-hush. Abortion equals violence, oppose both.
Arakunrin ati Arabinrin (ladies and gentle men) for a mother to kill a human life, within her womb is emotionally traumatic for her. The full effects may take years to surface, but the guilt, when it comes, can be as torturous as killing a fully-formed human. So articles have shown that the emotional scars suffered by women who have had abortions “oyun sise” are quite tragedic in nature. Many regret the decision they made to kill their child. They say that if they had the choice again, they would choose a different course of action. “o ga o: e pa o boro mo: aso ti bo lorun omo eye,omo eye ti rin iho ho woja
The emotional scars cannot be seen but can only be felt in the heart and told by those who have the scars. There is no doubt to whether killing a baby is traumatic for most mothers, the question is just whether we choose to listen to the cries of their hearts. Emotions after all can be ignored, but will you choose to ignore, or give the mothers of this world hope for forgiveness?
The Christian message brought a dignity to the concept of the individual person and the value of life. The gospel taught that Jesus was conceived in Mary’s womb by the Holy Spirit. What grew in her womb from conception was not a blob of tissue, but the person of the God-man Jesus. So growing in each pregnant mother’s womb, is not just a blob, it is a person, the beautiful person God has created. What then, gives us the right to torture, then murder, the God given, God created human life, within the womb? Nothing “ko si rara ati rara ni”
This entire concept cannot be proven. It is a faith belief. If the pro life forces triumph and abortion is again condemned, it may be that other family preserving values will be strengthened. But if we fail, few other family values or interpersonal moral values can endure if the one person ordained by nature and God to protect each helpless innocent little one is allowed to kill her own flesh and blood to “solve” her own personal social or economic problem.
Through abortion, the mother can be physically damaged beyond repair and emotionally traumatised with guilt. Abortion should be illegal, because of the repercussions suffered by the mother, child and other family members. Abortion is morally and ethically wrong and damaging and should be illegal. Abortion is an immediate, personal one on one, voluntary decision over which participating person has direct control that is except for the unborn. Who will speak for them? Who will stand up for the life which they represent? Will you?