Sunday, March 12, 2017

ANTONIA HATES WAR! WAR I DON'T WANT TO HEAR ABOUT YOU!

WAR! O WAR!!

……..Mot’olani Antonia Fagunwa
                            BLACK -PEN

With the breeze of the evening rain we sat
Talking, playing and laughing—all on hat
Until they came under  your instruction
I heard the air whistling our destruction

To your men with the green uniform
A strong barrier we could not form
Kids cried out blood and ran to the dell
You made many found shelter in the well

I wished you came democratically
For my black ink wailed apoplectically
The soil mourned in my left hand
For souls to be buried in our hand

The moon felt my pain and turned black
Voices drummed as we hummed our lack
We asked: how long, in our land, will you last?
War! When will you be a thing of the past?





ODE TO NIKE BISI-TAIWO

 Tolu' Elusiyan


Today, in the not too long distant past. The world for the first time knew silence
For about forty five minutes
Birds of the air stood still
And there was darkness in the heart of men
Expecting a new born whose destiny would radiate light

Nature for the first time recorded the unfounded
Voices of the sparrows
And behind the horizon of the rumbling sky rained confusion
In the darkness of doubt was the birth of doubtless light
Upon whose shoulders the empire would rest.

It is the birth of Hercules only not of zeus
But of the family of BISI-TAIWO
The birth of beauty: ADENIKE BISI TAIWO
A face seen passing in a crowded street
A voice thin and heard large and soft
Smiles like the twinkles of the stars
Uprightness coupled with brightness
Dove like nature stand! What a beauty to behold!

And from that moment life was transformed
And we became of more heroic generation
Meet to freely ask and give
Fated that is fated
Brought me to the front
Young warlock to ADENIKE BISI-TAIWO
My great friend with black beauty
Whose spoken English can dazzle the mind

No knowledge taught by unrelenting years
Can quench this untamable desire
The space in the bright teeth
Call for the worship of beauty
the woman of unquestionable virtue
Discipline is her moral
Whose self-confidence can penetrate the wall
Moving steadily to the realm of kindness
If I come to the world again and again

I would love to meet you!

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

MERCY FOR CHILDREN

MERCY FOR CHILDREN……………………………Elusiyan Tolu'


WHAT IS MERCY?
Mercy is necessarily identified with compassion and forgiveness. Mercy arises from the confluence of two currents of thought: compassion with the pity that it entails and fidelity with love as a requirement. Mercy comprises of love, tenderness, pity, compassion, clemency, kindness, grace or gift of God, and that offers us a more intensive generic concept.
Mercy originated from the father, and this is everywhere in the scripture. God is presented as a compassionate God who does not get angry easily, slow to anger.
Give thanks to the lord for he is good, for his mercy endures for ever (Ps 107:1). Be merciful even as your father is merciful (Luke 6:36). This is an essential condition to enter the kingdom of heaven. Blessed are the merciful, for they shall obtain mercy, which means, if we are not merciful, it would be very hard for us too to obtain the mercy of God. For God our father always manifests mercy (Mt18:32). Because even Gods love is only present in those who exercise mercy. It is out of this mercy that Jesus Christ accepted the mission of salvation so that we can all be saved.
“Francis was shopping at the mall for Halloween candy when he was hit by a shopping cart pushed from the second story by two young boys. Francis suffered a serious brain injury, and was briefly in coma and underwent weeks of physical therapy but through it all he held no ill against the boys....” I wish them well, I do”, he said. “I feel very sorry for them. My younger brother is 13 also, and he is a very good boy. Several years after recovery, Francis was also rubbed by these same boys, he was able to recognize them and he also forgave them”.
This is the kind of mercy the church is talking about, ability to be able to forgive again and again. Though the word mercy could be too complex for you children to understand but it is always part of your activities, perhaps in school or at home but it needs to be concretized so that you can come to appreciate God the merciful father. Who is a God like you, pardoning iniquity and passing over transgression for the remnant of his inheritance? He does not retain anger for ever because he delights in mercy.
Working with children, I have picked up a few critical pieces of information about how children learn. For example, children require simple explanations in terms of how they can understand instinctively. Children also have little patience for information or activities that seem irrelevant to their concerns, they learn new concepts best when they can relate to the topic personally.
Pope Francis knows this well, which is why he hopes families, in this year of mercy, will provide children with an experience of mercy.
I have tried in so many ways of describing mercy to children. The definition that works best expresses mercy in terms of power.
*Mercy means having power, and choosing to use that power to help others, not hurt them.
Those of us who knows super hero stories can relate to this easily. For example, Jetli, Jackie Chan or Commando, the actors are very powerful men in movies, he can destroy anything, he can kill any bloody person, but they can also protect people around them from evil because of the kind of power they have. So as a child of God, we are also Super heroes if we chose to be merciful to others, our friends in classroom, on playgrounds, in catechism class, in the church, at choir practices, and where ever we find ourselves.
Sometimes we often think we don’t have any power. Because our lives are heavily scripted by outside forces such as parents, teachers, societal expectations, etc. But as a dear friend of mine always tells the children in the school she heads,” the remarkable thing is that you always have a choice”.
Truly as children we have a choice. We have all kinds of power to choose our behaviour, attitudes and words. If i may ask you, “do you have power over your parents? Do you have a choice when your mom tells you to set the table? I know many of you would say NO, but then we reflect on several options:
*I can refuse to set the table
*I can set the table, but only after mom asks four or five times
*I can make my younger brother set it for me
*I can start setting the table, but leave it half done
*I can set the table and complain about it
*I can set the table and be cheerful
*I can work hard, setting the table as best I can
*I can set the table, and then ask what else I can do to help.
As children we are very powerful, because we have that choice to do whatever we want to irrespective of the forces around us; but the choice we make in life has a long way in determining what we become. That is why we must not be selfish; we must learn how to share our milk candies, our sweet, our pencils, our pens with others. We must learn how to relate with everybody, we must be ready to share our knowledge.
Sometimes we might fall victim a bully. We must learn to be merciful and see everything in the light of mercy and we that have that kind of tendency to bully people as well we must learn to be super heroes for Jesus by showing mercy to others even though they have wrong us, we must learn to bear wrongs patiently.


HOW CAN WE SHOW MERCY?
As children we can show mercy, some of you might be thinking mercy is meant for our parents, it is meant for all of us, as children we have to be compassionate, we have to show love to others, we have to be kind and patient, we have to be humble, we have to learn how to speak politely to people, we have to learn from our parents, we have to live like a child of God, we have to be merciful, we have to be prayerful, we have to pray for our parents, we have to pray for our friends, most especially those who are sick who couldn’t come to church or school, we have to be of our best behaviour, that is our mandate. And by playing those roles, we are been merciful both to ourselves, our environment, and the people around us.
And parents you also have an important role to play because often, all these things are learnt from parents, when your child does something the next thing is to shout at him or her. No, sometimes you have to scold gently, sometimes you have to admonish and overlook it, and these are the ways in which we can teach our children to be merciful.
And we too children; that we are often been forgiven does not mean we should always misbehave; for whenever we are of our best behaviour, we are also replicating that act of mercy to our parent, to God and to our surroundings or people around us.
That pencil, no matter how beautiful it is, learn how to borrow others, that food, no matter how delicious it may be, learn how to share it with others.
We as children we should also love the word of God, we should always ask our parents to discuss with us about the word of God, we should learn from them what mercy looks like to Jesus.
*The call of Matthew (Mt9:9-13)
*The lost sheep
*The unforgiving servant
*The cleansing of a leper
*The Good Samaritan
*The lost sheep
*The lost coin
*The lost son
*Zacchaeus the tax collector
*The good thief
*The Samaritan etc.
We should learn more from our parent about those scriptural stories; if we do, we would continue to grow in the knowledge of mercy.
In school there might be some of your classmates who eat alone, do things alone, or sit away from the action at recess. Perhaps a child is unpopular, poorly dressed, awkward, or in need of deodorant. God’s mercy might be calling you to offer friendship.
As children we should be aware that we learn much more about God’s mercy when we show consistent tenderness for unlovable, ungrateful, or wilful people in our lives.
As children, let us also know that the year of mercy invites us to consider all the indirect ways God attracts us to himself (nature, music, art, literature, laughter, tears). Mercy never gives up. Mercy looks for back doors, cracked windows, or even broken roofs to bring spiritually crippled friends to Christ, remember the story of the paralytic man in Mark 2:1-12 and Luke 5:18-26
Conclusively, we as children of God, we must be aware that this year of mercy in the church now is a treasure of immeasurable value, a means of learning how to be more human and Christian, how to live like the saviour Jesus Christ, how to live more like a catholic, how to show love to others in a very much exhaustive ways, how to help our parents, how to be kind, tender in heart and be compassionate. If we have compassion on our friends by helping them out, if we have compassion on our parents by behaving and listening to instructions, if we have compassion on God by helping others in their little tasks, if we have compassion on our teachers by not making noise in class, if we have compassion on God by obeying his precepts and truisms, then God would grant us mercy as well.
May the mercy of God continue to abide with us and as we have gathered as one family, as a community of Gods people to learn more about this all important event in the life of the church, may his mercy never depart from us and may He give us the grace to have the spirit of compassion, forgiveness, kindness and love of others through Christ our lord. Amen.








MERCY AND FORGIVENESS

MERCY AND FORGIVENESS
……ELUSIYAN TOLU’ FRANCIS

INTRODUCTION
Bless the Lord, O my soul and all that is within me, forgetting not his benefits, nor forgiveness of iniquity, bless Him, who brings healing and redemption to our lives, crowning us with loving kindness and with blessings, satisfies (psalm 103:1-5). Having learnt so many things about mercy, this section is very crucial for it apprehended all our discussions in the past and it also showcases another perspective that is more intensive and profound. And as a matter of fact one cannot talk about mercy without making allusion to forgiveness simply because they are very much expiated together. For if you are not merciful you cannot forgive. And to talk of mercy presupposes kindness, compassion, clemency etc.

MERCY IN THE LIGHT OF FORGIVENESS
 We are not oblivious of the fact that there is a lot to forgiveness and that is why in certain contexts, forgiveness is a legal term for absolving or giving up all claims on account of debt, loan, obligation, or other claims. Forgiveness could be considered simply in terms of who forgives including forgiving themselves, in terms of the person forgiven or in terms of the relationship between the forgiver and the person forgiven. In most contexts, forgiveness is granted without any expectation of restorative justice, and without any response on the part of the offender (for example, one may forgive a person who is incommunicado or dead). In practical terms, it may be necessary for the offender to offer some form of acknowledgement, an apology, or event just ask for forgiveness, in order for the wronged person to believe himself or able to forgive.
Let us take a look at these:
*Someone recklessly cuts in front of you on the highway, almost forcing you off the road
*Your friend still has not paid back the sixty dollars he borrowed a year ago
*Your family has been criticizing your life style
*You find out that your spouse has been unfaithful.
What do you do in situations like these? Can you forgive them? Should you forgive? Or should you give them what is coming to them?
We all are aware that the Holy Scripture teaches us to forgive others. But sometimes it seems like it is impossible to forgive, because the wrong that has been done is so great. Sometimes it seems like it just wouldn’t be fair to be merciful
When there seems to be a conflict between mercy and justice, it may be that we do not clearly understand the nature of genuine forgiveness and mercy. The Bible teaches us to show mercy in a way that lets us both fair and genuinely useful to all involved. One thing is that we sometimes get confused about mercy, is that we tend to replace mercy with artificial substitutes. Essentially, mercy is a divine quality. “To you, o lord, belongs mercy” (psalm 62:12)
Divine mercy has nothing in common with the petty revenge and “get-even” kind of “fairness” that tends to occupy our thoughts. And it has little in common with the superficial pardon or even condoning of evil that is sometimes passed off as mercy. The lord’s thoughts are far more merciful than ours. It is in speaking of his mercy that the lord says, “My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are my ways your ways” (Isaiah 55:7-9)
And one of the things that distinguish true mercy from its substitutes is its constancy. And that is why in the gospel of Matthew 18:21, 22 where peter came to Jesus asking, “Lord, how often shall my brother sin against me, and I forgive him? Up to seven times?” Jesus said to him, “I do not say to you, up to seven times, but up to seventy times seven”. That shows mercy is that ability to be able to forgive again and again, just continue to forgive, forgiveness ad infinitum, it has no end.
A true forgiving person will not show mercy one moment and malice the next, because the two cannot mix together, for instance, to forgive your friends but not your enemies is not true mercy, because it would be done for the sake of some favor you might get in return. Love your enemies… for if you love those who love you, what rewards have you? (Matthew 5:44-46). We can truly be merciful by completely rejecting any desire for malice or revenge.

MERCY AS A WAY OF LIFE              
As part of the reflection that pope Francis offered in his final meditation for the Jubilee of priests and seminarians which was titled “the good odor of Christ and the light of his mercy”, the pope made them to understand that “being merciful, instead is not only “a way of life”, but “the way of life”. So mercy is not an abstract word, but rather a way of life: one decides to be merciful or not; and to paraphrase the words apostle James, it may be said that mercy without works is dead, as what renders it living out to the needy, to the aid of those who are spiritually and materially disadvantaged. “Mercy has eyes to see, ears to listen, and hands to console”
According to Pope Francis catechesis during the jubilee audience in St. Peter’s square, attended by around fifteen thousand people. Francis noted that, since in daily life we are aware of the needs of the poor and needy, we are called to respond to this condition of suffering. “At times we pass before situations of dramatic poverty and it seems as if it does not touch us; everything continues as if nothing were wrong, in an indifference that in the end makes us hypocrites and, without our awareness, leads to a form of spiritual lethargy that makes the heart insensitive and life sterile. People who pass by, who go ahead in life without taking account of the needs of others, without noticing the many spiritual and material needs, are people who are not useful to others. Remember, those who do not live to serve, are not useful in life”
Those who have experienced God’s mercy in their own life cannot remain indifferent to the needs of their brothers and sisters. Jesus’s teaching does not provide any means of escape: I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was in prison and you came to me. You cannot delay when faced with a person who is hungry: you must give something to eat. Jesus tells us this. The works of mercy are not theoretical ideas, but consist instead, of concrete witness. We need to roll up our selves to alleviate suffering’ says Pope Francis
As a result of the changes in today’s globalized world, some forms of material and spiritual poverty have multiplied and, he explained, we must therefore be creative in finding charitable solutions and identifying new working methods, so that the way of mercy can become increasingly concrete. We are therefore required to remain alert as sentinels, so that, faced with the poverty resulting from the culture of wellbeing, the Christian outlook does not become weak and unable to focus on the essential’ and this focusing on the essential means focusing on Jesus, looking at Jesus in the hungry, the imprisoned, the sick, the naked, in those without work who must maintain a family. Look upon Jesus in these brothers and sisters of ours; look upon Jesus in those who are lonely, sad, in those who have made mistakes and are in need to walk the path with him in silence in order to feel they are not alone. These are the works that Jesus asks of us. Look upon Jesus in them, in these people. Why? Because Jesus looks upon me, he looks upon all of us.

WORKS OF MERCY
The works of mercy have been traditionally divided into two categories and each with seven elements:
1.      Corporal works of mercy which concern the material needs of others
2.      Spiritual works of mercy which concern the spiritual needs of others
Based on the doctrine of Jesus Christ on the sheep and the goats, the corporal and spiritual works of mercy are a means of grace as good deeds and their omission is a reason for damnation. Because the messianic age will be a time of mercy, and because the church believes this age began at Jesus’s coming and believes Jesus obeyed every commandment and fulfilled the scriptures, Catholics perform the works of mercy.
In particular cases, a given individual will not be obligated or even competent to perform four of the spiritual works of mercy, namely: instructing the ignorant, counseling the doubtful, admonishing sinners, and comforting the afflicted. These works may require a definitely superior level of authority or knowledge or an extraordinary amount of tact. The other works of mercy, however, are considered to be an obligation of all faithful to practice unconditionally. In fact pope Francis suggested “ care for creation” as a new work of mercy. Corporally, it means simple daily gestures of peace and love; spiritually, it means contemplation of the world.
Corporal works of mercy are those that attend to the bodily needs of other creatures. They come from Isaiah 58 and the commandment of hospitality. The seventh work of mercy comes from the book of Tobit and from the commandment of burial, although it was not added to the list until the middle ages.
The works include:
1.      To feed the hungry
2.      To give drink to the thirsty
3.      To clothe the naked
4.      To welcome the stranger (previously referred to as “harbor the harbor less” and “shelter the homeless”)
5.      To visit the sick
6.      To visit the imprisoned (previously referred to as ransom the captive)
7.      To bury the dead.
8.      To care for our common home
The spiritual works of mercy
Just as the corporal works of mercy are directed towards relieving corporeal suffering, the aim of the spiritual works of mercy is to relieve spiritual suffering. The first four come from Ezekiel 33, the fifth comes from the commandment of forgiving others before receiving forgiveness from God, the sixth comes from Deuteronomy 15, and the seventh comes from Maccabees 2.
They include:
1.      To instruct the ignorant
2.      To counsel the doubtful
3.      To admonish sinners
4.      To bear patiently those who wrong us
5.      To forgive offenses
6.      To console the afflicted
7.      To pray for the living and the dead
8.      To care for our common home

THE POWER &GRACE THAT FORGIVENESS & RECONCILIATION CAN BRING TO OUR RELATIONSHIP.
One of the most frequent issues I deal with as a pastor is the issue of forgiveness. There is so much hurt among people and the tendency is to bottle it up in an unforgiving spirit. It would be easier to hold a grudge, but scripture is clear we have an obligation to forgive…just as we have been forgiven.
Whenever I address this issue, I get push back from those who say they cannot get over what was done to them. I remind them that the Bible does not say we must forget, but to forgive. There is a huge difference. It does not even say we should allow forgiveness to be an open door for continued abuse by someone. The goal is to free our heart by letting go of the anger, bitterness, and frustration with the person who wronged you.
This is not only because God commanded it, but practically speaking, the emotions brought on by failing to forgive begin to control you and serve no purpose to repair the relationship or you. Holding onto the pain certainly does not teach the other person a lesson or make them a better person. Of course, when the other person keeps causing new injury it makes it even tougher, but it does not release us from an obligation to forgive.
Forgiveness brings much to a person’s life:
It frees you from the emotional weight of the pain. It doesn’t take the pain away, but it releases the hold those emotions continue to have on your heart. Holding bitterness too tightly causes a range of negative emotions and even causes physical stress to a person.
Gives an earthly picture of grace. Most of the time there is no earthly or rational reason to forgive. Forgiveness gives something that is mostly undeserved. What a picture of God’s grace.
Helps you sleep better at Night. The emotional weight of an injury is often heavier than the actual injury and takes longer to heal. When a person forgives another, it feels as though pressure is released from one’s shoulders. Forgiving people have less stress and more joy, regardless of the pain in their life.
As a matter of fact, the most painful experience in life is being seriously and deliberately harmed by someone else.
Car crashes, even fatal ones, are accidents; no one sets out to deliberately injure or kill with their car. Cancer is also an impersonal attacker, an internal cellular malfunction. But when someone willfully abuses us, perhaps verbally, physically, financially, emotionally, that feels altogether different. That pushes our pain levels off the scale and can feel worse than the most serious physical injuries or diseases.
It was not an accident, it wasn’t a mistake, and it wasn’t a malfunction. Someone purposely decided to wrong and damage us. There is a personal choice, a human will, behind the pain.
That searing agony; was that not the worst part of Christ’s sufferings? Not so much the nails or the thorns, but the malice of the soldiers, the denial of peter, the desertion of the disciples, the betrayal of Judas, and above all, the felt abandonment by the Father.
Avoid or Attack: our most common responses to being abused are either attack or avoid, retaliate or distance, both of which result in even greater damage to ourselves and others, including anger, bitterness, resentment, and even depression. But there is an alternative to taking vengeance or taking cover and that is giving forgiveness.
Full forgiveness; the best kind of forgiveness is when our attacker or abuser confesses his sin asks for forgiveness, and we are enabled to do so from the heart, just as God for Christ’s sake did for us. This kind of reconciliation is one of the greatest joys for any Christian to experience. It is so liberating, so refreshing, and so exquisite.
However, what if there is no confession, no repentance, no request for forgiveness? We have maybe tried to bring the offender to repentance and reconciliation, but without success. What then?
Are we doomed to carry around this burden for the rest of our lives? Do we just keep turning our back or looking for an opportunity to get our own back? Or do we just forgive anyway, regardless of whether the person wants any forgiveness?
Lesser forgiveness; the answer is not avoidance, nor attack, but neither is it unconditional forgiveness, giving full forgiveness where none is sought. There is a fourth option: maybe we can call it ‘lesser forgiveness’
Lesser forgiveness has two parts. First, there is a forgiving attitude, being ready to forgive, eager to forgive, even praying for the opportunity to forgive. It’s about being forgiving without actually giving forgiveness. Second there is a giving of the matter over to God. It’s saying, I am not going to carry this around any longer. I am not going to attack or avoid, but neither can I reconcile. So I give it over to God, I let it loose from my heart, and I say, the judge of all the earth will do right.
Bitter or better? Although psychologists lack the theological basis for offering true forgiveness to their clients, they recognize that forgiveness helps bitter people become better people. In his book ‘the how of happiness’, Sonja lyubomirsky argues that whereas ‘preoccupation, hostility, and resentment that we harbor serve only to hurt us, both emotionally and physically’ empirical research confirms that forgiving people are:
1.      Happier
2.      Healthier
3.      More agreeable
4.      More serene
5.      Better able to empathize with others
6.      More spiritual or religious
7.      More capable of reestablishing closeness in relationship
That’s seven major benefits of forgiving, to which we can add the benefit of an improved relationship with God as well (Matthew 6:12, 14-15)
Amazingly, lyubomirsky’s first strategy for practicing forgiveness is to appreciate being forgiven! It’s a pity that it’s taken scientists a couple of thousand years to discover that what Jesus was teaching all these years ago is true.
*There is no sin that cannot be forgiven; Jesus in the Saint. Faustina Apparition
God is a God of mercy, mercy is originated from him and in fact he is mercy himself, there is no sin that is forgivable, for out of his mercy he gave us his only begotten son so that we can all be saved and indeed we have been saved, for the love of God endures forever, he is compassionate full of love and kindness. And that is why on almost every page of St.Faustina’s Diary, one perceives Jesus’ yearning that his mercy may be known without any limit on it. Thus on April 4, 1937, Sister Faustina received this invitation from him: ‘write this: everything that exists is enclosed in the bowels of my mercy, more deeply than an infant in its mother’s womb. How painfully distrust of my goodness wounds me! Sins of distrust wound me most painfully’ (diary, 1076)
And on Christmas Eve of that year, she received the following message:
“in order that you may know at least some of my pain, imagine the most tender of mothers who has great love for her children, while those children spurn her love. Consider her pain. No one is in a position to console her. This is but a feeble image and likeness of my love. Write, speak of my mercy. Tell souls where they are to look for solace; that is, in the tribunal of mercy (the sacrament of reconciliation). There the greatest miracles take place and are incessantly repeated. To avail oneself of this miracle, it is not necessary to go on a great pilgrimage or to carry out some external ceremony; it suffices to come with faith to the feet of my representative and to reveal to him one’s misery, and the miracle of divine mercy will be fully demonstrated. Were a soul like a decaying corpse so that from a human standpoint, there would be no hope of restoration and everything would already be lost, it is not so with God. The miracle of divine mercy restores that soul in full. Oh, how miserable are those who do not take advantage of the miracle of God’s mercy! You will call out in vain, but it will be too late.”(Diary, 1447-48)
Conclusively, as on can see, words of boundless tenderness spring from the mouth of Jesus’ words are definitively rooted in ecclesial language with references to the ‘tribunal of mercy’ and the woeful warning to avoid falling into the abyss of ‘too late’, which nevertheless remains a serious possibility if one so chooses. In a way as never before, the message given to St. Faustina throws open the depths of mercy, which can welcome and contain everything, except the derision of God.

REFRENCES:
THE GOOD NEWS BIBLE
THE SAINTS IN MERCYPastoral Resources for living the Jubilee” Our Sunday visitor Publishing Division, our Sunday visitor, Inc., 200 Noll Plaza, Huntington, 2015.
THE JUBILEE OF MERCYGuide to the extraordinary Holy Year December 8, 2015-November 20, 2016, Lozzi Roma publication, 2015
THE PSALMS OF MERCY “Pastoral Resources for living the Jubilee” Our Sunday Visitor publishing Division, Huntington, 2015
THE CORPORAL AND SPIRITUAL WORKS OF MERCYPastoral Resources for living the Jubilee” Our Sunday Visitor Publishing Division, Huntington, 2015.
THE PARABLE OF MERCYPastoral Resources for living the Jubilee” Our Sunday visitor Publishing Division, our Sunday visitor, Inc., 200 Noll Plaza, Huntington, 2015.





GADAMER'S PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS

DISCUSS THE ROLE OF PREJUDICE IN GADAMER’S PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS. HOW DOES IT ILLUSTRATES THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PHENOMENOLOGY AND HERMENEUTICS

BY TOLU' ELUSIYAN

PRELUDE                
Gadamer presents a positive view of prejudices in his view of his view of hermeneutics. According to Gadamer, all of us come to the text with our own prejudices  or “horizons” and these biases are not be understood as solely negative or as necessarily closing off understanding. Though it is the case that our prejudices or presuppositions can and do set limits on our interpretative endeavors, it is not the case that our prejudices are unalterable nor are they always active in a negative limiting way. Rather, they have a positive or productive function as well and actually promote understanding. Addressing this positive aspect of prejudices, Gadamer writes,
Prejudices are not necessarily unjustified and erroneous, so that they inevitably distort the truth. in fact, the historicity of our existence entails that prejudices, in the literal sense of the word (pre-judgment), constitute the initial directedness of our whole ability to experience. Prejudices are our biases of our openness to the world. They are simply the conditions whereby we experience something, whereby what we encounter says something to us. This formulation certainly does not mean that we are enclosed within a wall of prejudices and only let through the narrow portals those things that can produce a pass saying, “Nothing new will be said here” (Truth and Method, p.9)
Until we engage a text with openness to being changed by that text, we are often unaware of our biases. Thus, it is through our dialogic encounter with the text that are prejudices are made evident to us, that is, we must be open or made open to having our presuppositions laid bare. However, our concern in this work is to discuss the role of prejudice in Gadamer’s philosophical hermeneutics and how it illustrates the difference between phenomenology abd hermeneutics.

THE ROLE OF PREJUDICE IN GADAMER’S PHILSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS
In the act of consciousness that is knowing, Gadamer is of the position that the comprehension of the background or the positions of the object of consciousness and the subject of conscious is very much imperative such that in the act of consciousness the prejudice of the subject of consciousness is of revered essential in the act of consciousness, the background of the object may not be essential as such.
For this reason therefore, Gadamer is of the position that the structure of prejudice of the subject of the subject in the act of consciousness must be well understood in order to have the truth of a particular reality. This structure of the prejudice of the subject of the subject of consciousness behind the object of consciousness is what Gadamer refered to as the fore-structure of understanding with special reference to prejudice. So, Gadamer opines that the prejudice of the subject of consciousness in addition to the position or background of the object of consciousness is the paradigm to having a good understanding of the truth of the nature of the object of consciousness he refers to as tradition.
Moreover, he held that prejudice affects the mood of interpretation on the nature of any object of consciousness which include: historical texts, art, culture etc.), he further posits that for one to claim to have an understanding object of consciousness in life, the person must side-line all other perspectives of prejudice. Gadamer is interested in what makes understanding possible. And this he explains in the fore structures of understanding.
However, Gadamer sees the role of prejudices in his philosophical hermeneutics more in the form of hermeneutics of humanism with regard to the interpretation of historical texts. For Gadamer, since the human being is a being of language, the implication of this for the understanding of the human sciences which include art, culture and historical texts, is that before we get to the chance to approach these human sciences objectively, they have already shaped our world perspective. And as a matter of fact, that our individual world views in any object of consciousness is what Gadamer referred to as prejudice. Furthermore, for Gadamer, we are conditioned by our position in history in such a way that we cannot return to the perspective of past authors. Nonetheless, we can still understand their works because our conditioning actually facilitates the understanding as it opens the world to us. We can truly understand the meaning of a text or event if we relate it to our own concepts, preconceptions, and prejudices. Therefore, the interpreter spells out the meaning of a text in his own historical situation.
Finally we could say, that prejudice in Gadamer’s philosophical Hermeneutics helps in the true understanding of the meaning of a text, it exposes the role of the interpreter in a given historical situation, and also through prejudice, we gain a better understanding of ourselves for it helps in the dialogue of understanding because prejudice can distort even though there is interplay.

HOW PREJUDICE IN GADAMER’S PHILOSOPHICAL HERMENEUTICS ILLUSTRATE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN PHENOMENOLOGY AND HERMENEUTIC
Phenomenology has to do with understanding of the object consciousness either through the object or through the subject perspective while hermeneutics has to do with the interpretation of the background of the object and subject of consciousness. Bringing to fore from the Husserl and Heidegger, phenomenology could be referred to as a science of consciousness which make effort to comprehend and know the object of consciousness as the case may be through a method which either subscribe more to either the role of the object of consciousness or the subject of consciousness. On the side of Gadamer, Hermeneutics could be considered to be more of a science of interpretation which attempts the interpretation, understanding, clarification and elucidation of the background of the constituents of the act of consciousness, the object and the subject of consciousness, in the act of consciousness or the process of knowing that of a particular reality.

CONCLUSION

By way of conclusion on the account of this discourse, we have been able to examine the meaning of prejudice according to the perspective of Gadamer without putting aside the role it plays in the philosophical hermeneutics of Gadamer and how it illustrates the difference between phenomenology and hermeneutics.

EXPERIMENTATION ON HUMAN SUBJECT


                                                                                                                        TOLU' ELUSIYAN

1.0 INTRODUCTION
In the history of human existence, the experimentation on human subject has been both meritorious and de-meritorious, but there seems to be no balance, because research with human subjects is littered with a history of scandal that often shapes people’s view of the ethics of research. Conversely, there are even examples of government run research that took advantage of the helplessness of the subjects to ensure their participation and which resulted in the subjects experiencing unembellished harms. However, our concern in this discourse is the examination of the experimentation on human subject but with a critical evaluation to awake rational minds from their slumber and this shall be run open under the following thematic outline:
A.    What is Experimentation?
B.     The Human Life and Dignity
C.     The Experimentation on Human Subjects
i. The image problem
ii. Stem cells: Technology and Ethics
Iii. Human Cloning
     D. Evaluation/Conclusion
1.2 WHAT IS EXPERIMENTATION      
What is experimentation? What do we mean when we say experimentation; it is an operation or procedure carried out under controlled conditions in order to discover an unknown effect or law, to test or establish a hypothesis, or to illustrate a known law. An experimentation or experiment is also a process carried out to support, refute or validate a hypothesis. Experiments provide insight into cause and effect by demonstrating what outcome occurs when a particular factor is manipulated. Experiments vary greatly in goal and scale, but always rely on repeatable procedure and logical analysis of the results. There also exist natural experimental studies.
Furthermore, a child may carry out basic experiments to understand gravity, while teams of scientists may take years of systematic investigation to advance their understanding of a phenomenon. Experiments and other types of hands on activities are very important to student learning in the science classroom. Experiments can raise test scores and help a student become more engaged and interested in the material they are learning, especially when used over time.[1]
In the scientific method, an experiment is an empirical procedure that arbitrates between competing models or hypothesis[2]. Researchers also use experimentation to test existing theories or new hypothesis to support or disprove them[3]. An experiment usually tests a hypothesis, which is an expectation about how a particular process or phenomenon works. However, an experiment may also aim to answer a “what if” question, without a specific expectation about what the experiment reveals, or to confirm prior results. If an experiment is carefully conducted, the results usually either support or disprove the hypothesis.
1.3 THE HUMAN LIFE AND DIGNITY
For the Holy mother Catholic Church, there is no distinction between defending human life and promoting the dignity of the human person. The holy father Pope benedict xvi writes in caritas in veritate no.15 that “the church forcefully maintains this link between life ethics and social ethics, fully aware that a society lacks solid foundations when, on the one hand, it asserts values such as the dignity of the person, justice and peace, but then, on the other hand, radically acts to the contrary by allowing or tolerating a variety of ways in which human life is devalued and violated, especially where it is weak or marginalized”.
As a gift from God, every human life is sacred from conception to natural death. The life and dignity of every person must be respected and protected at every stage and in every condition. The right to life is the first and most fundamental principle of human rights that leads catholics to actively work for a world of greater respect for human life and greater commitment to justice and peace. Having discussed the dignity of human life we shall now discuss the experimentation of human subjects which is the heart of this work with basic and historic examples to help us integrate and internalize the discourse in question.
1.4 EXPERIMENTATION ON HUMAN SUBJECT
THE IMAGE PROBLEM
Human subjects are body used in the process of experimentation, and yet, despite the litany of failures to maintain ethical standards in research, these remain the exceptions and a focus on scandals can seriously distort proper discussion about research ethics. Research involving human subjects is not intrinsically ethically dubious as some would say. That is not to say it does not contain ethical challenges, but these concerns can often be met. Nor does it diminish the immense social importance of human subjects in experiments and the huge improvement in the quality of lives and number of lives saved through such research. The most pressing question in research ethics is often not whether we should be doing research but how can we balance or justify exposing individual human subjects to risk for the sake of the advancement of science? Sometimes, in the case of therapeutic trials, research subjects potentially stand to benefit should the treatment prove successful.[4] However, such cases are rare when considered against the time it takes for the results the time it takes for the results of research to be fully developed. The benefits are therefore often distributed among future populations rather than the individuals taking part in the trial. Matters are made even more complicated in cases where trials are conducted on subjects who are potentially vulnerable or desperate.
STEM CELLS: TECHNOLOGY AND ETHICS
Stem cells are non-specialized cells that have the capacity to divide indefinitely in culture and to differentiate into more mature cells with more specialized functions. That means that stell cells are the origin of other cells in the human body. They are the core cells from which other cells are derived. They are the bearers and givers of being to the cells of the human species. To reach them is to reach the innermost deposit of what makes the human being what he or she is, at least from the biological point of view[5]
While nobody has been as of yet cured of any disease arising from the search on embryonic stem cells, there are true cures coming from adult and umbilical cord stem cells. Indeed, literally tens of thousands of people have already been cured of various ailments and treated for various disorders with adult stem cells. Numerous cures are indeed already happening with the non-morally objectionable sources of stem cells.[6] There are however, major problems to be overcome. One area of such problems is the use of adult stem cells for more expensive treatments and cures. The reasons are obvious. Adult stem cells are older, more vulnerable and less susceptible to use and further development. They are also limited in availability and can be applied to less people in comparison to need. Where they are available they are in less and minute qualities. They are also often weaker being older and having been more intensively used that the new ones from children or embryos. And this makes adult stem cells more difficult toisolate and purify, compared to embryonic stem cells, they have less potentials for flexible utilization and effectiveness.[7] Above all they contain more DNA abnormalities. This is because of the toxins, sunlight and errors in them that make them more difficult to multiply and deploy. These potential weaknesses make adult stem cells highly limited in usefulness and efficiency.
More positive however, is the embryonic stem cell.in this case, pluripotent stem cells are isolated from human embryos that are just a few days old. At this stage, they are highly fecund and can thus be used for various purposes and for numerous treatments and transfers. The brand new stem cell is a mine of medical progress and further development. They can be made pluripotent that is, endlessly multiplying in the laboratory for all intent use. Many medical experts do derive these cells from foetal tissue obtained from terminated pregnancies. Such harvested cases are then put to use in therapy, maintenance, growth or other treatment of illnesses. In another reprise, p.dixon reports: a study has shown that bone marrow stem cells from an adult human form healthy brain tissue. That means that the use of such marrow stem cells can bring about very important tissues like that of the human brain which are fundamental in constituting a human person. The reason for this wonder is not to be over wondered[8]. This should not surprise us Dixon maintains. It is because all adult stem cells contain all the genetic code needed to produce an entire clone, that is reproduction or repetition of the same human being. In principle therefore these stem cells are able to produce whatever tissues or organs that the human being needs to become a human being.
HUMAN CLONING
The cloning debate involves scientists, legislators, philosophers, and international organizations, but not always harmoniously. general agreement, if not absolute unanimity, evolved that human reproductive cloning, for the purposes of producing a human genetic copy baby is unethical. Wilmut himself explained to the united states congress that cloning animal involved a high failure rate, since of his 227 reconstructed embryos, only 29 were implanted in ewes and only one developed successfully. Similar experiments with humans would be totally unacceptable, wilmut concluded[9]. The high failure rates more than 90 percent and high morbidity of animal cloning strongly suggests its inapplicability to humans. Furthermore, cloned animals seem to suffer high deformity and disability rates.[10] Dolly herself was finally put down in 2003, at the age of just six and a half years, even though many sheep live more than 10years. She had developed a progressive lung disease, which is usually found in older sheep, as well as premature arthritis. Some cloning experts have consequently hypothesized that cloned humans might need hip replacement surgery while still adolescents and might suffer from senility by the age of 20.
EVALUATION/CONCLUSION
By way of evaluation and conclusion on the account of this discourse, experimentation on human subjects taking stem cells technology and human cloning as a case study: Human beings are more than stem cells. We need to research into cells, but at the same time we need to go higher and look at the being, values and ultimate destiny of the human person. The above proviso must colour the objectives of stem cell researchers.[11] They must see us first and foremost as persons. Then their desire and function to help us will have more authenticity and achieve better fruit. While developments in stem cell research is ongoing, while the human genome mapping has been completed and more hopes are being raised as to the benefits to come from this feat, we must nevertheless equally see that no human being is made a victim of the others. This is a clarion call to respect lives, all lives, including the life of the human embryo. Life may never be willfully destroyed in the name of research. Life is life, and all life is equal. This is a fundamental ethical imperative.it is the bottom line of all our study, research and preoccupation with science and art, with medicine. This brings us to consider the last segment of the new regenerative medicine: the medical wonder of cloning.
Conversely, the ethical ramifications of cloning, especially with regard to humans, seem to defy easy limitation. Even if cloning technique problems are resolved with time, many questions remain. On what grounds could reproducing children by cloning be allowed or prohibited? Should cloning be used for sterile couples or for homosexual couples who want biological offspring? How would a child born by asexual reproduction experience life, as a unique individual or as a genetic ‘prisoner’? Is a cloned child simply a twin of its genetic donor, with a certain time lag? Should parents choose the traits of a future child, as is possible with cloning? Those and other such issues now preoccupy scientists and bioethicists who see in cloning procedures the potential to endanger human identity[12]. Consequently, after several considerations, several countries have formulated opinions and regulations on human reproductive cloning. In France, the national consultative ethics committee for health and life sciences addressed central dilemmas when in 1997 it rejected human reproductive cloning. The notion that perfect genetic similarity would in itself lead to perfect psychic similarity is devoid of any scientific foundation, stated the committee, adding that human reproductive cloning would cause a fundamental upheaval of the relationship between genetic identity and personal identity in its biological and cultural dimensions. And finally the life and dignity of man must always be respected.











[1] Stohr Hunt Patricia, An Analysis of Frequency of Hands on Experience and science achievement, Journal of research in science,pdf
[2] Griffith W. Thomas, The physics of everyday phenomena: a conceptual introduction to physics (third edition) Boston: Mcgraw hill, pp.3-4,pdf
[3] Wilczek Frank, Fantastic Realities: 49 mind journeys and a trip to Stockholm, New Jersey: world scientific.pp 61-62,pdf
[4] Some have argued that this should go even further with the recruitment of the terminally ill for experimental drugs.
[5] Pantaleon Iroegbu Stem cells: Technology and Ethics, lecture note, Dr. Philip Edema, Saints peter and paul major seminary, Bodija, ibadan p.623
[6] ibid
[7] Ibid p.624
[8] ibid
[9] Human cloning: Lecture note, a photocopied material, published by united nation edicational scientific and cultural organization: preface written by Koichiro Matsuura, the director general of UNESCO,P.11
[10] IBID
[11] Pantaleon iroegbu stem cells: Technology and ethics, op.cit p.633
[12] Human cloing, op.cit,p. 11-12